What is our system-level execution readiness verdict?
Generate a single, integrated assessment of organisational execution readiness by synthesising Work Design, Team Reality & Gaps, and Alignment & Performance inputs.
Generate Fit SummaryThis generator synthesises structural design, capacity realism, and alignment stability. It does not evaluate market conditions or individual performance.
What This Generator Produces
Fit Summary consolidates all PeopleBooks evaluator inputs into a single system-level verdict. It identifies whether structural design, capacity allocation, and coordination integrity collectively support sustainable execution.
- Cross-pillar structural coherence
- Capacity-to-design integrity
- Alignment stability across operating cycles
- System-level fragility exposure
- Founder-grade execution verdict
When To Use
- After completing all three evaluators
- When preparing for board or investor discussions
- When execution instability persists without clear root cause
- When leadership requires a consolidated structural view
- When deciding whether to scale
Synthesis Model
Fit Summary integrates scoring across three pillars:
- Work Design — Structural architecture
- Team Reality & Gaps — Capacity realism
- Alignment & Performance — Coordination stability
Each pillar contributes equally to overall execution readiness.
Total System Score: 100 points
Suggested weighting:
- Work Design — 33%
- Team Reality & Gaps — 33%
- Alignment & Performance — 34%
System Verdict Bands
- 85–100 → System Structurally Ready
- 70–84 → Viable but Fragile
- 50–69 → Structurally Constrained
- 0–49 → Execution System Unstable
Assessment Complete. This verdict reflects system-level execution readiness only.
Required Inputs
- Completed Work Design evaluation
- Completed Team Reality & Gaps evaluation
- Completed Alignment & Performance evaluation
Fit Summary does not generate standalone insight. It synthesises prior structural evidence.
How Fit Summary Fits Into PeopleBooks
Work Design defines structural architecture.
Team Reality & Gaps validates structural capacity.
Alignment & Performance validates coordination stability.
Fit Summary integrates all three into a founder-grade execution verdict.
