PEOPLEBOOKS

Are our teams aligned and able to execute together consistently?

Evaluate whether priorities, goals, and accountability are coherently aligned and whether execution remains stable across operating cycles.

Run Alignment & Performance Evaluator →

This evaluator assesses structural alignment and execution stability. It does not evaluate culture or individual performance.

What This Evaluator Does

Alignment & Performance determines whether teams operate against the same priorities, resolve trade-offs coherently, and maintain stable execution rhythms. It identifies structural misalignment that produces friction, escalation, or inconsistency.

  • Priority coherence across roles
  • Escalation frequency patterns
  • Trade-off resolution clarity
  • Operating rhythm stability
  • Execution stability under pressure

When To Use

  • Priorities shift frequently
  • Handoffs break between teams
  • Trade-offs escalate to leadership
  • Delivery quality varies week to week
  • Execution destabilises under deadline pressure

Scoring Model

Total Score: 100 points

  • Priority Coherence — 0–20
  • Escalation Pattern Stability — 0–20
  • Operating Rhythm Consistency — 0–20
  • Trade-Off Resolution Integrity — 0–20
  • Pressure Response Stability — 0–20

Verdict Bands

  • 85–100 → Structurally Aligned and Stable
  • 70–84 → Aligned but Friction Present
  • 50–69 → Misaligned and Reactive
  • 0–49 → Structurally Fragmented

Assessment Complete. This verdict reflects structural alignment and execution stability only.

Structural Operators

Alignment & Performance is composed of five operator tests that isolate coordination and stability failure modes.

Escalation Pattern Detection

Tests whether escalation is exceptional or routine in resolving execution trade-offs and conflicts.

Run Operator

Priority Coherence Mapping

Tests whether all roles operate against the same top priorities or interpret them independently.

Run Operator

Operating Rhythm Consistency

Tests whether execution operates on a stable, repeatable cadence rather than urgency or escalation.

Run Operator

Trade-Off Resolution Integrity

Tests whether resource and priority trade-offs are resolved through explicit decision logic rather than escalation or negotiation.

Run Operator

Pressure Response Stability

Tests whether execution remains stable under deadline compression, capacity shock, or delivery slippage.

Run Operator

How Alignment & Performance Fits Into PeopleBooks

Work Design validates structural architecture.
Team Reality & Gaps validates capacity realism and survivability.
Alignment & Performance validates coordination and execution stability.
Fit Summary synthesises system-level execution readiness.